Friday, December 3, 2021
46.2 F
Larchmont
HomeLocalsUpdate: Larchmont vs Mamaroneck in LMC Media TV Dispute

Update: Larchmont vs Mamaroneck in LMC Media TV Dispute

LMC Media Studios in Mamaroneck Town Center

The junior partner wants out and its neighbors are outraged.

The Village of Larchmont says it is pulling out of the agreement that has funded the local community TV operation, LMC Media, for the past 40 years.  It is a dispute over money, what some are calling “a cash grab.”

Larchmont has demanded a disbursement of $100,000, and the Cable TV Sharing Agreement’s other two partners, The Village and Town of Mamaroneck, have refused.

By giving a one-year notice of withdrawal, Larchmont can begin collecting and keeping its share of area cable TV fees starting in 2023 without contributing to the community TV project.  Although there is no record of Larchmont Trustees publicly debating the matter, residents of the Village were notified on Thursday.

NOTICE from Village below

LMC Media (Formally known as LMC TV) produces and distributes a variety of TV content including local sports, government meetings, community events, and public affairs programming for Larchmont, the unincorporated parts of the Town of Mamaroneck, and the largest entity which is the Village of Mamaroneck, which includes Rye Neck in the neighboring Town of Rye. LMC Media owns a remote broadcast truck and operates a multi-media studio at the Town of Mamaroneck Center on Boston Post Road near Mamaroneck High School. Larchmont makes up about 17% of the area governed by the trilateral cable agreement which was formed in 1982 to give municipalities more bargaining power when negotiating rates with cable providers.

The Executive Director of LMC Media, Matt Sullivan, says he was stunned by the suddenness and timing of the announcement. “We simply did not expect this sort of move,” he told us.

Village of Mamaroneck Mayor Tom Murphy also expressed dismay at Larchmont’s unilateral withdrawal.  He issued a statement in part suggesting Larchmont was trying to punch above its weight.

“The Village of Mamaroneck looks forward to renegotiating new franchise agreements with our friends in the Town of Mamaroneck. With the Village of Mamaroneck’s 20,000 residents and the Town’s 13,000 residents, I am confident we will still have ample bargaining power to strike a good deal with the cable providers. We will miss Larchmont’s 6,000 residents and hope they can strike a good agreement on their own.”

Full Tom Murphy Statement

Mayor Lorraine Walsh responded to our inquiry by stressing the notice of withdrawal is intended to address unspecified “operational and financial concerns,” and that the these are “not a reflection on LMC Media,” but issues the three municipalities need to resolve. Larchmont and the Village and Town of Mamaroneck each have a vote on a three member Board of Control which is scheduled to meet Wednesday evening.  Larchmont’s representative on the BOC is Trustee Sarah Bauer. It is expected Larchmont will renew its demand for $100 thousand dollars from the collected funds at that time.

Editor’s note: The writer is a frequent volunteer contributor to LMC Media

Village of Larchmont Notice

What is the CATV Sharing Agreement?

In the early 1980’s, as cable television subscriptions increased, the Village of Larchmont, Village of Mamaroneck and Town of Mamaroneck, entered into a CATV Sharing Agreement (the “Agreement”). The primary purpose of the Agreement was to give the partnering municipalities greater bargaining power with respect to negotiating Franchise Fees with the local cable companies.  Secondarily, the Agreement established a tri-municipal Cable TV Board of Control (BOC) with equal representation and created a method for the per capita disbursement of cable Franchise Fee funds to the 3 municipalities.

What are Franchise and PEG Fees?

Local governments receive Franchise Fees from cable operators as compensation for the use of public property to run their cables. There are no restrictions on how these Franchise Fees may be used. We also receive PEG Fees for capital purchases related to use of public access channels.

For your information, in 2020 Larchmont’s share of the annual Franchise Fees was approximately $140,000, roughly equivalent to 1% of that year’s Village property tax levy. Historically the BOC has supported public access cable by turning over the majority of the Franchise Fee funds to LMCTV (now LMC Media). Additionally, the BOC had about $1.3M in surplus PEG Fee funds of which Larchmont’s share would be $220,000.

What are Larchmont’s Concerns?

The world of communication and media has changed drastically in the 40 years since the Agreement was created. Over the past few years, Larchmont has raised concerns with the BOC regarding its operation, the disbursement of our governmental funds and the future sustainability of revenue as cable subscriptions trend downward.

These are our main concerns:

Operation of BOC

·      Other than to the 3 municipalities, the Agreement does not acknowledge how, to whom or for what purpose the Franchise Fee and PEG Fee funds might otherwise be disbursed. There is no statement of the purpose, goals, or mission of the BOC beyond the BOC’s management of its relationship with the cable companies.

·      In March of 2021, Larchmont requested that $100,000 of our PEG fee funds be transferred to us for capital expenses to improve the transmission quality of our government meetings which are broadcast on the government access channel. To date, we have not received these funds because of the lack of clarity about procedure within the BOC.

Disbursement of Funds

As noted, the BOC historically has supported public access cable by turning over the majority of the Franchise Fee funds to LMCTV (now LMC Media). They did this without a formal agreement ever being put in place. These governmental funds make up almost 90% of LMC Media’s annual operating budget. The PEG funds have also been given by the BOC to LMC Media for capital and equipment expenditures, such as the purchase of a mobile media van. A proposed $1M expansion of their studio space is currently on the table. In summary, Larchmont’s concerns regarding such disbursement of funds are:

·      The lack of a written agreement about whether, and to what degree, Franchise Fees will be turned over to LMC Media annually.

·      The lack of clear parameters about how LMC Media may use the Municipalities’ franchise funds.

·      The lack of clear expectations about what services LMC Media will provide to the BOC member municipalities in exchange for these Franchise Fees.

·      The lack of a written agreement means that issues of legal and financial liability of the BOC for LMC Media have been left unaddressed.

·      Without an agreement in place, there is concern that BOC member municipalities may be expected to supplement dwindling Franchise Fees to fund LMC Media.

To be clear, the issues described here are with the operation of the BOC and the lack of clarity on the financial and legal relationship the BOC has with LMC Media, and not with LMC Media itself.

Why withdraw from the Agreement? And why now?

It has become clear that the CATV Sharing Agreement, which is very limited in scope, does not appropriately address the interests of the BOC members and their constituents.

We have tried to work within the BOC to address our concerns and clarify outstanding issues, but to date we have not made meaningful progress. We anticipate continuing to work with our partners to resolve the issues described above.

However, we are up against two clocks:

1. The period to renegotiate the 15-year term cable franchise agreements is imminent. We want to be in the best position to protect the financial and legal interests of Larchmont’s residents in those agreements. It is possible we may need to do this outside of the BOC.

2. The CATV Sharing Agreement requires a one-year notice to withdraw.

Therefore, we have reluctantly decided to withdraw from the Agreement by giving the required one-year notice. The Village’s effective date of withdrawal will not be until November 8, 2022.

It is the Village’s hope that we can address these issues in the next year and we are committed to work with the Town of Mamaroneck and the Village of Mamaroneck to try to determine the best way forward.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

C O M M U N I T Y • C A L E N D A R